Thursday, 7 August 2014

Quit Playing Around: Monkey Stirs Up Copyright Controversy with Selfie

A brief departure from copyright in the education sector and more a post on copyright education. As you know, I am a big fan of bizarre and random stories, and yesterday saw the return of the 'monkey selfie' story as reported in the Telegraph. Briefly, a British wildlife photographer was photographing crested black macaque monkeys in Indonesia when the monkeys began to show an interest in his equipment and started taking pictures of themselves. One of the photos has found its way on to Wikimedia and now the photographer is threatening to sue for copyright infringement and damages. But if the monkey took the photograph, who really does own the copyright?

First off, let's do some copyright 101: for an artistic work to benefit from copyright, it must be original and a product of intellectual creation, skill and judgement by its author. We will return to questions of ownership shortly, but first let's examine whether this photograph would qualify as an artistic work to benefit from copyright.The Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (CDPA) states in s.4(1) that an artistic work means, among other types of work, "a photograph,...irrespective of artistic quality". Photographs which are 'selfies' are not new; rather they have become more popular with the widespread use of smartphones. The Oscar selfie earlier this year is a classic example; this was a product of Ellen DeGeneres' creation, bringing together top celebrities into one frame of a photograph, thereby making an original work (it is highly unlikely that photos including all of these celebrities exist). You could argue that the level of skill and intellectual creation is fairly limited, but it is an original work nonetheless and qualifies for copyright. Does the monkey's selfie differ, then, from the Oscar selfie? Particularly as the photograph was not actually taken by Ellen DeGeneres? The problem with the monkey selfie is that, although it is original in the starkest sense of the word, there appears to be little intellectual creation, skill and judgement (although how can we criticise the monkey, given that it can't tell us..?!), unless the shot was set up by the photographer in some way, adjusting settings, focus, filters and so on to capture 'true' likenesses. Additionally, if the photographer has adjusted the image using Photoshop (see the Red Bus case which continues to perplex lawyers), an element of intellectual creation, skill and judgement could be argued.

But what about the question of authorship? The author, as defined by s.9(1) of the CDPA, means "the person who creates [a work]". On first glance this would appear to be the monkey, who quite literally 'created' the work when it touched the trigger and set off the camera. However, animals cannot be authors according to the CDPA, and therefore their works are not subject to copyright. So is there actually a copyright owner in the work, or is the photograph not subject to copyright at all and therefore public domain?

Could it be argued that the photographer did not actually create the work because he did not take the photo? It's not quite as simple as that. Although the CDPA does not go into further detail about the author of an artistic work, leading legal experts have submitted that the author "is the person who made the original contribution and...need not be he who pressed the trigger" (Laddie, Prescott & Vitoria, The Modern Law of Copyright and Designs, 4th ed, 4.61 p.254). 'Original contribution' in this sense can take several forms: there may be originality, for instance, in the use of angle, filters, light, exposure, and so forth which create a photograph. There may be originality in terms of the creation of a scene or subject to be photographed; this certainly is the case in the Oscar selfie, but may also include the set up and control of the illumination of the subject. Finally, it may just be a 'right place right time' type of originality, the photographer capturing a scene because he made a special effort to go and find it. In this respect, the wildlife photographer would appear to qualify as at least a contributor to the photograph. There is an added complication that allegedly the monkeys found the camera by accident and that the photographer did not set up the shots, but even so the serendipity aspect of originality cannot be completely ignored. 

Finally, could this be considered as a computer-generated work? Again, the CDPA in s.9(3) states that the author of a computer-generated work "shall be taken to be the person by whom the arrangements necessary for the creation of the work are undertaken". It is less likely that this work could be construed as a computer-generated work, but it would appear that the same principles of authorship could apply, in that the photographer would be the author of the work.

It's a fascinating debate and I would definitely want to be in court watching this particular case. It is difficult to say whether the arguments would go in favour of the photographer being the author; this is certainly the verdict in a blog post by our US friends across the pond, who argue that as there was no official creator of the photograph other than the monkey, and the monkey does not qualify as an author, there is therefore no copyright in the photograph. It does however seem a bit unfair to the photographer, who should probably be recognised as a contributor at the very least. Perhaps we should ask the monkey? ;-)

31 comments:

  1. This case will show how contradictory copyright law is. No copyright will be awarded - and I believe none should be. A serious revamp of the law is needed. Different tests of originality should be thought up and applied to the various types of "cultural creations".

    ReplyDelete
  2. Why is it unfair to the photographer? He literally did nothing; he didn't even expect something like this to happen. We already have way too much proliferation of copyrights as it is, allowing it in this case would be ridiculous.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I do have some sympathy with him though - it is hard to be a photographer nowadays, and to go all that way and get a picture which is fantastic but which he won't even be credited/known for is quite harsh. I'm not advocating that copyright should be attached to the work, but it might be courteous to acknowledge the fact that it was in some small way down to him for leaving his camera for them to play with.

      Delete
  3. Wonderful, just what a blog it is! This blog has provided the helpful data to us continue the good work.Halt checking essay writing help!It's these!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Fascinating information I haven’t been experienced such information in quite a long time.ratemywriters.com

    ReplyDelete
  5. Informative post.Good content and writing format is the main element of the good post.I took this information for my writing for the reference

    ReplyDelete
  6. Keep on posting these types of articles. I like your blog design as well. Cheers!!!

    OET Coaching in Melbourne
    OET Training in Melbourne
    Best OET Coaching in Melbourne

    ReplyDelete
  7. I am an avid reader who likes engaging content. That's why I am here. Your original views on this topic are refreshing and interesting. You've done a great job of expressing your views. Thank you.
    tu 95| call of duty| clicker heroes| strike force heroes 2| kitten cannon
    scooby doo games| scooby doo| brain games| braingames| brain

    ReplyDelete
  8. That's really a marvelous post. This post contains useful information which helps us a lot. I have never seen such a great post. Your wonderful post can inspire a lot and helps us. I visit your website often and share with my friend.
    trademark infringement

    ReplyDelete
  9. MOST WANTED
    http://www.boombu.com - fitness you x
    http://www.sextamina.com - sex xx
    http://www.aceofbeauty.com - fat loss sexy
    http://www.bestbuyx.com - sex xx
    http://www.theorchidx.com - orchids orchidaceae phalaenopsis care
    http://www.babxyz.com - dog food xx
    http://www.babysolve.com - baby potty xx
    http://www.suwandri.com - options trading xx
    http://www.googleclickbank.com - forex fx xx
    http://www.jelema.com - fat loss xx
    http://www.bestbuygameguide.com -- betting money xx

    ReplyDelete
  10. Firstly I may need to remember you that you set out to make on this bona fide and key subject. Also, you're making has an enable that unmistakably express how magnificent a writer you are. Cloud Hosting

    ReplyDelete
  11. With a Hotmail account, you can send and receive emails quickly and easily as well as login and use all Microsoft services.
    hotmail login | sign in to hotmail | create hotmail account
    This is the game so players feel very fierce , adventurous . You try to join and play this game , you will feel great like.
    strike force heroes | strike force heroes 4 | tank trouble 2
    slither io | earn to die | goodgame empire | happy wheels

    ReplyDelete
  12. which really is a immature share of the issues many people unrecorded with sect now, but but making improved lives for group that is direction on feat them much , keeping them punter aid and making certain their kids get enlightened. spreader bar

    ReplyDelete
  13. You made this kind of fascinating piece to peruse, giving each subject illumination for us to get learning. A debt of gratitude is in order for imparting the such data to us to peruse this header fabrication

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anyone will work but some are mostly designed for indoor use. I hope you're not stupid enough to put an expensive one. It might fall during an earthquake. Go to Lowes.

    equinox louvered roof

    ReplyDelete
  15. The good side is the training is second to none (whatever Big 4 you choose). You will learn more in your first year than most people will in three who simply take a job as an entry level accountant in the corporate world.

    Fort Collins Colorado CPA

    ReplyDelete
  16. I examine it 2x and thats no longer no how what mum calls blonde-info. i think of you're goung to could email me with the punch line, or a minimum of submit it once you percenta ultimate answer, Coz i think of I musta ducked a cow kick and neglected it. yet i like maximum of ya different jokes greater useful. I dont could think of so no longer undemanding.

    Kioti tractors

    ReplyDelete
  17. I had downloaded the recipe now I can't find it. The ladies were all raving about it on Care2. I never tried it myself so I can't say. Clementines are oranges but a different variety from what I understand. I'm mentioning it because it took very few ingredients and had caused quite the stir.

    tucson fitness centers

    ReplyDelete
  18. Best Spoken English coaching. A very student friendly environment. http://www.spokenenglishclass.com

    Leading IELTS training. Guaranteed results. http://www.ieltscoachingcenter.in

    ReplyDelete
  19. click here to get Maharashtra HSC Result 2017

    ReplyDelete
  20. Click here to get karnataka sslc result 2017.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Students can check TN HSC Result at official website.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Click here to get HSC Result Gujarat at official website.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Click here to Check the Latest information about Recurring deposit interest rates of hdfc Bank.
    hdfc bank rd calculator

    ReplyDelete
  24. Hi, I agree with you. Really this blog is very informative.

    RRB Bilaspur Official Website
    RRB Bhubaneshwar Result 2017 Date & News

    ReplyDelete
  25. Thanks for sharing information..Click Here For Indian Railway Notifications, Upcoming RRB Recruitment

    Railway Recruitment Notifications

    ReplyDelete